Pakistan: Anti-Terrorism Bill Threatens Fair Trials

Summary

(New York) – The Punjab provincial assembly in Pakistan on August 31, 2026, passed a bill that would threaten the right to a fair trial in counterterrorism proceedings, Human Rights Watch said today. The provincial governor should return the bill to the assembly, which should develop rights-respecting protections for such proceedings, subject to independent oversight. The Anti-Terrorism (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2026 authorizes unspecified government officials to designate “ special security cases ” in which the identities of judges, prosecutors, police officers, witnesses, and defense lawyers could be withheld from defendants.

“Protecting witnesses and court officials from possible harm is essential, but it’s no excuse to deprive defendants of their right to a fair trial,” said Patrica Gossman , senior associate Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Punjab and other provincial assemblies in Pakistan should ensure that all their criminal laws, including counterterrorism legislation, meet international due process standards. Human rights groups and political opposition leaders have raised concerns that the secrecy surrounding trial proceedings could impair defendants’ access to evidence needed for an effective appeal, and that the proposed law’s insufficiently defined authority could be used against political opponents, peaceful protesters, and other people.

The authorities should address those risks through adequate protection measures that preserve defendants’ ability to challenge evidence, consult their lawyers confidentially, and appeal convictions, Human Rights Watch said. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Pakistan is a party, ensures the right to a fair and public hearing before an independent, impartial tribunal, along with rights to prepare a defense, examine prosecution witnesses, and seek review of a conviction. The United Nations Human Rights Committee, the independent international body that provides authoritative interpretation of the covenant, has specifically warned against “faceless” judges in counterterrorism proceedings, finding that tribunals combining such secrecy with restrictions on defense rights do not meet basic fair trial standards, including independence and impartiality.

Human Rights Watch has previously opposed Pakistan’s use of sweeping counterterrorism powers on several occasions, including the Protection of Pakistan Ordinance in 2014, because of threats to fundamental rights, and the use of overbroad terrorism charges in 2023 against opposition supporters engaged in peaceful protest. Punjab’s government should revisit the law and hold broad consultations with human rights advocates and lawyers on protections based on demonstrable risks in individual cases. Any restrictions should be necessary, proportionate, open to independent scrutiny, and compatible with an effective defense, Human Rights Watch said.

This summary (405 words) is drawn automatically from the report's own text: every sentence is Human Rights Watch's, selected to represent the report, in the order the report gives them. Some context is necessarily lost; read the full report before quoting it.